1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
Google Ads – all profits go to buy public records from UO
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < euler’s number.
- Trouble down at the Eugene... (7)
- Pollyanna John has been an excellent addition to the OBF. He's cosmipolitan and very informed about the larger world of music festivals; he helped bring a... – Friday
- uomatters Please be specific and provide actual information, otherwise you are just contributing noise. – Wednesday
- Anonymous John was a liability in a multitude of ways. The administration got it right in this case. – Wednesday
- Coltrane, Bronet take Grad School... (7)
- Happy guy After being under the "direction" of Kimberly Espy, the Graduate School was probably more than ready to separate from that office! – Friday
- anon and wear some nice shoes for the contest! – Thursday
- uomatters I've got a lot of money tied up in University of Nike coffee cups, but this is an excellent suggestion. Any chance you can get... – Thursday
- uomatters Berglund reports to Shelton. As I read the job description the next Dean will instead report directly to Bronet. – Thursday
- anon Kimberly Espy was VP of Graduate Education as well as Research. When Brad became VP they decided to move GE off of his duties and... – Thursday
- that effing Dog again remember, everyone is interim around her now I suggest we rename ourselves to Interim Oregon University since that would be IOU and that would certainly... – Thursday
- Brad Shelton isn't the Dean of the Gradudate School - that would be Andy Berglund. – Thursday
- Doug Blandy's confidential strike plan... (25)
- Working GTF We've worked very closely with GTFs in these positions to delineate their duties as a student from their duties as an instructor. This issue in... – Friday
- anon What would graduate students that research in a lab do in the event of a strike? – Thursday
- Working GTF Oh, ok, I see that now. Reminds me of the risible attempt to form the not-at-all-an-attempt-to-break-the-union "Graduate Student Association," that came out of the Graduate... – Thursday
- Anas Clypeata I love that Mr. Blandy put the word "CONFIDENTIAL" at the top of a public record that was sent from a public employee to a... – Thursday
- GradStudent#3 "Approximately 45 percent of eligible graduate students have a GTF appointment. The university’s compensation offer includes: mostly things already in the CBA" Hey Grads who... – Thursday
- Anonymous Paul Shang: SOC 312, Quantitative Methods in Sociology. Construction and interpretation of tables and graphs, descriptive statistics, measures of association and contingency relationships, basic ideas... – Thursday
- Working GTF Yeah, I didn't read it as an invite to scab, more as a communique which lays bare the deep disconnect between Johnson Hall and the... – Thursday
- UO Grad Student I just don't really see that as a solicitation to scab. I don't see a solicitation for anything, really. Which part of the email are... – Thursday
- Fund TF recommendations with $... (1)
- Hen With enough left over to settle with the GTFF. – Thursday
- NYT on the hidden costs... (27)
- uomatters Dear F@&king Clueless: Thanks for your comments. I'm writing to ask you to change your screen name to something that will be slightly less strikingly... – Wednesday
- F@&king Clueless Doesn't matter and yet here you are. Shang...seriously? That's a pretty low bar. – Wednesday
- I thought you graduated, are you here for another year? – Wednesday
- UO Matters Doesn't Matter I haven't looked at the trash blog in a while, but it seems like you are grabbing for anything you can these days Bill. Dr.... – Wednesday
- http://totalfratmove.com/oregon-greek-life-on-social-probation-for-two-weeks-after-wednesday-rager-hospitalizes-five-girls/ – Tuesday
- I didn't know anyone actually believed that. Everyone knows Greeks rent houses off campus (and off the books) to party in. The University likes it... – Tuesday
- Independent given the overwhelming link no one denies between alcohol and sexual abuse, interesting that no one has noted that Uo fraternities and sororities may not... – Tuesday
- Mimi Goldman If blog readers are interested in more information about the dysfunctions of the Greek system they might check PAYING FOR THE PARTY: HOW COLLEGE MAINTAINS... – Tuesday
- IAC affirms assault prevention report,... (5)
- Administrator eats crow over academic... (9)
- Severinus de Monzambano United Academics is the only reason there was any raise. If you doubt that, all you have to do is read what the Administration was... – Tuesday
- MIT joins UO in pre-empting... (4)
- BiCoastal Oregon-MIT Assault Surveys: We Just Ask It or Oregon/MIT 2 AAU 0 – Tuesday
- uomatters If you can fit the essence of this comment into a coffee cup slogan, I'll give you one. – Monday
- BiCoastal "The Oregon-MIT BiCoastal Survey on Sexual Assault" "Free to any campus under a Creative Commons License" "An open-source, open-data survey instrument evolved from two 2014... – Monday
- Commentariat Alert to UO Trustees: up your game and get some talent to Eugene, admin types who are secure with themselves and can put UO on... – Monday
- Frances Bronet's claims on grad... (9)
- synecdoche I have a recommendation for the University: Raise the tuition rate for GTFs to $10 million a year. Waive $10 million a year in tuition.... – Monday
- haha Careful. If you really go down this round, the GTFF union might decide they agree, and then you'll pay a dues on your tuition waiver,... – Monday
- Anonymous Scott Coltrane, interim president of the University of Oregon, who researches fathers and families, says more young men want time off with a new child... – Monday
- anon That's an interesting point about the in-state tuition. It seems like THAT would be a very valuable bargaining issue, too late for this time, but... – Monday
- Duck athletic's projected expenses increase... (13)
- Pollyanna Nah, I'm with Young Man. We've had a union for what, 2 years? A contract for one year? And everything's not fixed yet? After 20... – Monday
- F@&king Clueless I'll just say this Young Man to your suggestions about what the Union should do. The Union, like the Senate, is only as powerful as... – Monday
- Older »
- Trouble down at the Eugene... (7)
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity EMU Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) Frances Dyke: VP for Finance Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing live-blog March 8-9 rape allegations Martinez's (Diversity VP) 2nd $150K job Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Senate Sharon Rudnick Students Uncategorized UO Administration UO Foundation UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- Coltrane slips past JH security bubble for coffee with faculty 10/30/2014
- Eugene police earn $50K overtime per home football game 10/30/2014
- Coltrane, Bronet take Grad School control away from Shelton 10/30/2014
- Doug Blandy’s confidential strike plan allows faculty to cut finals, admins to hire “community experts” to scab on grad students 10/29/2014
- Fund TF recommendations with $ from bloated Robin Holmes budget 10/29/2014
- IAC affirms assault prevention report, despite Sheehan and Paris opposition 10/28/2014
- Administrator eats crow over academic freedom violation 10/28/2014
- PAC-12 university presidents approve minor reforms for athletes 10/28/2014
- NYT on the hidden costs of sorority life 10/28/2014
- UO Senate Task Force on Sex Assault seeks input before vote 10/28/2014
- UO Trustees ask The People’s help in choosing next Great Leader 10/27/2014
- MIT joins UO in pre-empting AAU sex assault survey monopoly 10/27/2014
- Frances Bronet’s claims on grad student paid leave are contradicted by SEIU 10/27/2014
- Jim Bean takes 2 days a week off from teaching for consulting work 10/26/2014
- Professor suspended over ironic comments and inappropriate sighs 10/26/2014
- What would Steve Prefontaine say about track and field championships? 10/26/2014
- Newspaper editorial assails new UO Board for secrecy 10/25/2014
- Administration wants 500 student dorm next to Olum Child Care center and First Nations Longhouse 10/25/2014
- Duck athletic’s projected expenses increase by $5.3M, more donation diversion 10/25/2014
- Coltrane sticks with Gottfredson’s final offer, and grad students vote to strike. 10/24/2014