1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
PollsSorry, there are no polls available at the moment.
Google Ads – all profits go to buy public records from Dave Hubin
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler’s number. Please use a screen name.
- UO's $5M academic brand campaign... (1)
- That 70s Show I can't wait to see the exciting spot, with students wearing argyle sweaters and sporting tortoise shell glasses, gauzy truck shot aerials of the quad... – Friday
- Bad news for Hubin, Park... (6)
- Trickortreat Someone with some deep pockets will have to take on the UO in something like this. Doug Park and well hell the GC has always... – Friday
- just different Thanks for posting the appellate decision. Park won't lose until someone actually fights him. Has anyone actually sued UO over public records disclosure? In my... – Thursday
- uomatters Yes, that's my read too. Decision is here: http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A149933.pdf I don't expect UO to change until Doug Park loses a few cases like this. – Thursday
- just different It looks to me like the Lane County DA (initially) agreed with the RG, but EWEB didn't want to comply, so they sued and (surprise!)... – Thursday
- Trickortreat nothing says transparency like lots of black marker – Thursday
- Logic-check Sorry, this isn't the slam dunk you are hoping for. The facts of the two cases (EWEB v. Register Guard and you v. University) are... – Thursday
- Striking students clash with police... (10)
- Trickortreat Send in the UO police force to take control of this riotous activity and place everyone involved on the bowl of dicks list!! – Friday
- Athletic department ditches Nike for... (16)
- Sports Fan Without academics most of the country wouldn't know we exist, either. – Friday
- Sports Fan This gets bandied about a lot but isn't technically true. A UOAA representative once said that he makes regular donations to the University that, over... – Friday
- outraged SERIOUSLY???? You are comparing Phil Knight to Mussolini and Hitler? A "faustian bargain"?? Fantasize much? – Friday
- outraged You seem to know Phil so very well, or are you mind reading? Do you always attribute your own paranoid fantasies to others? Would you... – Friday
- outraged The "open secret" was made up by UOM. Phil was never going to be at the tent announcement and he has never said he would... – Friday
- outraged What short memories people have. Phil gave 25 mil for FACULTY, the law school would not have been built for STUDENTS, the library is for... – Friday
- Sun Tzu Phil Knight is clearly a great guy. Look at all the wonderful things he has done: 1) He paid for 25% of the library renovation... – Friday
- Daniel Pope Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Knight has given a nickel to academics since 2000, when UO (briefly) joined the Worker's Rights... – Friday
- Ducks paid baby-sitter rapist $4,000... (16)
- Anon I hope the person who said "No warning – that would be a FERPA violation" isn't a UO Student. That has nothing to do with... – Friday
- Coltrane to limit bowl junkets,... (13)
- Senate Observer It is not the Athletic Department the Senate President sold out to, it was the administration. Take a look at the Senate Motions since the... – Friday
- RG Editorial Board argues UO... (27)
- Anonymous UO Alum UOM could point out to the UO board, admins, and donors that UCSB hasn't had a football team since 1992. Yet look how well UCSB... – Thursday
- uomatters And I thought I was a cynic! I don't think the board wants to destroy academics, they've just somehow convinced themselves that big-time athletics is... – Thursday
- Anonymous UO Alum The board is probably looking at paying big bucks for a new prez in order to provide some headroom for increasing the salaries of top... – Thursday
- Upset Student "Chief Athletics Administrator 465,000 + 7,000 stipend add-ons" "Dean, Graduate School 200,000 + 0 stipend add-ons" Something's wrong right there. – Wednesday
- UO grad I know the ideal candidate for the UO presidency. He has a Ph.D. in economics from Stanford, is the former Provost of a large BIG10... – Wednesday
- haha I'd be fine with the UO president getting a raise, if we peg our salaries to his or hers. I think the best admins aren't... – Wednesday
- another friend The last chart would be even more effective if it reflected the raises received by OA's. – Tuesday
- Harbaugh considering University of Michigan... (2)
- Nominations now open for worst... (20)
- anon and on and on Didn't the announcement of the settlement mention the stipulation that there would be no docking of pay? That seemed like a pretty smart show of... – Thursday
- Nomination For comment of the year from "Concerned STEM junior faculty" Wow! we are out of touch. Dog speaks the truth now, as he has in... – Thursday
- uomatters please use a screen name – Wednesday
- uomatters Please use a screen name – Wednesday
- anonymous Oh good, I didn't know that and stand corrected. – Wednesday
- Conflict of Interest Whole-heartedly agree on how wonderful it was to see Kimberly Espy kicked out of Oregon. But it is a bit sad that the most obvious... – Wednesday
- Old Grey Mare The administration taking over the assignment of grades during the strike. – Wednesday
- Thom Aquinas Best: Espy => Arizona Worst: Bowl of Ducks – Wednesday
- Duck athletics drives another campus... (1)
- Logic-check Sorry, this is a big "duh" and not really news. Of course there is a crime spike when there are large gatherings of people, especially... – Thursday
- Coltrane to give Duck AD... (3)
- uomatters Presumably Rob Mullens's lawyer was worried that UO might hire a President, or get a Board of Trustees, who would start emphasizing academics over athletics,... – Wednesday
- Anonymous 1 OMG! WTF?! I have never seen such a thing. How can that be? Have you ever seen something like this? If the President is no... – Wednesday
- haha I think we should peg his retention offer generosity to that given to professors who have recently received outside offers. – Wednesday
- Show up Th at 8AM!... (15)
- zach The RG later printed that the church-wharehouse structure was the only structure to be demolished for the new dorm plan. Last week I found Chris... – Wednesday
- Older »
- UO's $5M academic brand campaign... (1)
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity EMU Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) Frances Dyke: VP for Finance Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing live-blog March 8-9 rape allegations Martinez's (Diversity VP) 2nd $150K job Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Senate Sharon Rudnick Students Uncategorized UO Administration UO Foundation UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- Taco Bell, NCAA, and Condi Rice cheating Duck students out of Rose Bowl joy? 12/19/2014
- UO’s $5M academic brand campaign to take on “Go Ducks” steamroller at Rose Bowl 12/19/2014
- Striking students clash with police at UO’s partner University Omar Bongo, in Gabon 12/18/2014
- Athletic department ditches Nike for Adidas, gets twice the cash 12/18/2014
- Harbaugh considering University of Michigan offer 12/18/2014
- Bad news for Hubin, Park and Coltrane on hiding UO public records 12/17/2014
- Coltrane to give Duck AD Rob Mullens a retention offer, drop perverse incentives? 12/17/2014
- RG Editorial Board argues UO President is paid enough, already 12/17/2014
- Nominations now open for worst (and best) of the University of Oregon’s 2014 annus horribilis 12/16/2014
- Duck athletics drives another campus crime spike 12/15/2014
- Coltrane holds secret meeting with Gottfredson’s Athletics Advisory Group 12/15/2014
- Senate repudiates Triplett and Park proposal, directs TAIF to investigate potential retaliation against faculty 12/14/2014
- Coltrane to limit bowl junkets, tells admins to watch game at home 12/13/2014
- Updated w/ pres search news. UO Board of Trustees, Friday Dec 12th meeting live-blog 12/12/2014
- Did a pinch of Diane Dietz’s integrity rub off on Tobin Klinger? 12/11/2014
- UO Board of Trustees, Th Dec 11th meeting live-blog 12/11/2014
- Coltrane discusses efforts to keep UO faculty from leaving 12/11/2014
- Coach Altman thinks National Anthem is the wrong time to protest 12/10/2014
- Show up Th at 8AM! UO Board and committee meeting agendas and links for Wed-Fri 12/10/2014
- GTF strike ends in 9th day. GPA boilers relit. Educative production and admins bowl-game junket plans resume immediately. LCNI predicts neural activity to reach normal levels by noon. 12/10/2014