11/10/2011: Is your department searching for a new faculty member this year? Good luck getting start-up money from our new VP for Research Kim Espy. Jim Bean and her predecessor Rich Linton blew it all on pet projects and the Huron consulting contracts.
But you can get some easy cash from VP for academic affairs Russ Tomlin and his "Under-represented Minority Recruitment Program". Russ and interim VP for Diversity Robin Holmes - who seem to have a blank check from Pres Lariviere - will give your department $90,000 if you hire a racial or ethnic minority. (Women in science? Sorry, Tomlin's decided women do not count.) The UMRP rules are here, the basics are simple:
- During negotiations or up to one year after initial appointment of a qualified candidate
- For a candidate self-identified as a member of one of the federally defined underrepresented protected classes
- On determination of under-representation within the academic unit
For step two, the key phrase is "under-representation". Go to Table 2 in UO's Affirmative Action Plan to see if your academic unit has under-representation of tenure track minority faculty:
No luck? I didn't think so. The truth is that UO's tenure track faculty is representative of the available national hiring pool of minority PhDs, except for Music, which is one hire short. (Johnson Hall is three short on minority administrative execs, but that's another story. Do as we say, not as we do.)
So, how do you get under-represented minority recruitment money when there's no minority under-representation? Easy: VP Tomlin has made up his own special, illegal process for implementing his own personal vision of what he thinks federal affirmative action law should say.
Suppose your department of 10 people has a person from every minority, except, say, an American Indian. Payday! (But if you're in math or physics, no money for Asians. Russ Tomlin has decided there are just too many of those mathy Asians on campus already. And no money for Republicans or religious minorities. Tomlin and Holmes want faculty who look different, not faculty who think different.)
But wait. Surely you can't just claim to be American Indian. Don't you have to be an enrolled member of a federally recognized tribe? Everywhere else misrepresenting yourself as American Indian would be a serious matter. But not at UO. Just check the box.
Obviously this is dishonest. The UMRP, I mean. Lying to exploit it is too. If it's any comfort, you won't be the


Ugh. I am the whiniest whiny liberal you can imagine, but I hate stuff like this. HATE it. The solution for lack of minority faculty is encouraging opportunities for minority students to go into academia, not coming up with these bizarre check-boxes and poorly thought out incentive programs to scrape the bottom of the ocean for a potential hire who fits into some category. This is the kind of legitimate problem that makes conservative wackos lash out at academia.
ReplyDeleteThis is a classic Russ Tomlin program. He gets to play the big dick-wagger, deciding who's in and who's out and making petty calls on how departments can spend the money.
ReplyDeleteDog barks real loud
ReplyDeleteUOmatters says:
"Is your department searching for a new faculty member this year? Good luck getting start-up money from our new VP for Research Kim Espy. Jim Bean and her predecessor Rich Linton blew it all on pet projects and the Huron consulting contracts."
This is a big time problem and I hope UOmatters
can dig up more information.
For the sciences, these actions may have crippled the ability to hire good people over the next two years. The near term future has most definitely been robbed
and I wouldn't be surprised, given this, to hear
Espy say "Fuck this ..." and simply move on. I believe this act by Bean/Linton to be largely
unconscionable but, alas, it does not surprise
this dog.
All this is very depressing and yet another example that the university is not managed on ayn rational or objective basis, but rather funds are distributed in a arbitrary and personalized way by administrators who think they know what is best. It the kind of 'enlightened' mentality that threatens standards everywhere. a very frustrated latino
ReplyDeleteThe 'women in science' statistics are appalling.
ReplyDeleteyes, they are. additional data coming.
ReplyDelete"Wow, what an over representation of Minority Faculty on the UO Campus. Every where you walk or in the classrooms." It is nice to default to the fact that there are not enough white women in science, because we know they just don't hire women and there are so many qualified ones out there we don't have to scrape the barrell. Affirmative Action is ok for the white woman.
ReplyDeleteCome on UO Matters we have had this conversation, the normal route certainly isn't attracting minorities. And minority is not akin to the bottom of the barrel as someone stated above. Don't mix your alcohol brain with the stats please. Too much damn wine and barrels in your part of the world.